top of page

Note 04

​

Chronic Venous Disease and Varicose Veins: An Evidence-Based Review

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Introduction

​

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is one of the most common conditions encountered in vascular surgical practice, affecting up to 25–30% of adults and imposing a significant socioeconomic burden through reduced quality of life, loss of productivity, recurrent healthcare utilization, and chronic wound care.

Varicose veins represent the most visible manifestation of superficial venous insufficiency but should be viewed as part of a spectrum of chronic venous disease rather than an isolated cosmetic problem.

The vascular trainee should understand that modern management has shifted from traditional vein stripping towards minimally invasive endovenous interventions supported by robust randomized evidence and international guideline recommendations.

​

Epidemiology

​

Population studies demonstrate:

​

* Varicose veins affect approximately 20–30% of adults.

* Chronic venous insufficiency affects 5–15% of adults.

* Venous ulceration affects approximately 1–2% of the population during their lifetime.

* Women are affected more frequently than men.

* Incidence increases with age.

Major risk factors include:

* Increasing age

* Family history

* Obesity

* Pregnancy

* Occupations involving prolonged standing

* Previous deep vein thrombosis

* Reduced mobility

Pathophysiology

The primary pathological process is:

Venous Valve Failure

↓

Venous Reflux

↓

Ambulatory Venous Hypertension

↓

Microcirculatory Dysfunction

↓

Inflammation

↓

Tissue Damage

The visible varicosity is therefore a consequence rather than the primary disease process.

Mechanisms of Tissue Injury

Persistent venous hypertension results in:

* Endothelial activation

* Leukocyte trapping

* Inflammatory mediator release

* Increased capillary permeability

* Tissue edema

* Microvascular ischemia

Over time this progresses to:

* Hyperpigmentation

* Venous eczema

* Lipodermatosclerosis

* Atrophie blanche

* Venous ulceration

​

Clinical Classification

​

The CEAP Classification remains the international standard.

​

Clinical (C)

C0 – No visible disease

C1 – Telangiectasia / reticular veins

C2 – Varicose veins

C3 – Edema

C4a – Pigmentation / eczema

C4b – Lipodermatosclerosis / atrophie blanche

C5 – Healed ulcer

C6 – Active ulcer

All patients undergoing intervention should have CEAP classification documented.

​

Clinical Assessment

​

History

​

Symptoms include:

* Heaviness

* Aching

* Swelling

* Pruritus

* Night cramps

* Restlessness

* Skin changes

* Ulceration

History should also assess:

* Previous DVT

* Superficial thrombophlebitis

* Prior venous interventions

* Family history

* Pregnancy history

​

Physical Examination

​

Assess:

​

* Distribution of varicosities

* Edema

* Skin changes

* Lipodermatosclerosis

* Ulceration

* Arterial perfusion

Peripheral pulses must always be assessed before recommending compression therapy.

Duplex Ultrasound

Gold Standard Investigation

Current ESVS, SVS, and NICE guidelines strongly recommend duplex ultrasound mapping before intervention.

​

Objectives:

​

* Identify source of reflux

* Assess GSV

* Assess SSV

* Assess accessory veins

* Assess perforators

* Evaluate deep venous system

* Exclude DVT

​

A treatment plan should never be based solely on clinical appearance.

Evidence-Based Treatment

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

1.Compression Therapy

​

Compression remains fundamental in the management of:

* Venous edema

* Venous ulceration

* Patients unsuitable for intervention

​

However:

Compression does not correct reflux.

It improves symptoms and reduces venous hypertension but does not eliminate the underlying pathology.

​

2.Endovenous Thermal Ablation

​

Current First-Line Therapy

 

According to:

* ESVS 2022 Guidelines

* SVS/AVF Guidelines

* NICE CG168

Endovenous thermal ablation is recommended as first-line treatment for truncal venous reflux whenever anatomy permits.

Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA)

​

Mechanism:

​

Thermal destruction of the vein wall

↓

Fibrosis

↓

Permanent occlusion

​

Evidence

​

Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated:

* Occlusion rates >90–95%

* Significant improvement in quality of life

* Faster recovery than surgery

* Less postoperative morbidity

Five-year outcomes from major trials consistently demonstrate durable vein closure and symptom improvement.

Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

​

Mechanism:

Controlled thermal energy delivery.

Evidence demonstrates:

* Similar efficacy to EVLA

* Comparable long-term occlusion rates

* Less postoperative pain in some studies

Current guidelines consider EVLA and RFA equally acceptable first-line treatments.

​

3.Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy

​

Particularly useful for:

* Tributaries

* Recurrent veins

* Selected truncal reflux

* Patients unsuitable for thermal ablation

​

Advantages:

* Office-based procedure

* No anesthesia required

​

Limitations:

* Higher recurrence rates

* More frequent reinterventions

​

4.What Happened to Vein Stripping?

​

Historically:

High Ligation + Stripping was the gold standard.

​

However, randomized trials have shown:

* Similar long-term efficacy

* Increased postoperative pain

* Longer recovery

* More wound complications

Consequently, surgery has become a second-line option in many centers.

​

Nevertheless, surgery remains valuable in:

* Extremely tortuous veins

* Large aneurysmal segments

* Recurrent disease

* Unsuitable anatomy

​

Venous Ulcers

​

The EVRA Trial

One of the most important studies in modern venous practice.

The Early Venous Reflux Ablation (EVRA) Trial demonstrated:

​

Early intervention plus compression

compared with

Compression alone

​

resulted in:

* Faster ulcer healing

* Longer ulcer-free survival

* Improved quality of life

Median ulcer healing:

Approximately 56 days with early intervention versus 82 days with deferred intervention.

This trial fundamentally changed ulcer management worldwide.

​

Recurrence

​

Recurrence may occur because of:

* Neovascularization

* Disease progression

* Untreated reflux sources

* Inadequate preoperative mapping

​

Good duplex planning remains the most effective method of reducing recurrence.

​

Common Errors

​

Treating visible veins without identifying reflux source

Ignoring deep venous pathology

Failure to assess arterial circulation

Inadequate duplex mapping

Treating venous ulcers as wound problems alone

Overlooking perforator disease

Current Guideline-Based Treatment Algorithm

Symptomatic truncal reflux

↓

Duplex confirmation

↓

EVLA or RFA (preferred)

↓

Foam sclerotherapy (selected cases)

↓

Surgery when endovenous treatment unsuitable

Compression therapy remains adjunctive throughout the treatment pathway.

​

Take-Home Message

The most important question in venous surgery is not:

“Where is the varicose vein?”

The most important question is:

“Where is the source of reflux?”

If the source of reflux is not identified and treated appropriately, recurrence is not a complication,it is an expected outcome.

Understanding venous hemodynamics, meticulous duplex mapping, and adherence to evidence-based treatment strategies remain the foundations of successful modern venous practice.

722469361_122110104729352134_4998565679773920302_n.jpg
724170126_122110104789352134_4094026450464095897_n.jpg
724230688_122110104903352134_7556478815645354434_n.jpg
724789898_122110104861352134_2172105757818681605_n.jpg
724251637_122110104855352134_7368720585142043891_n.jpg
724287205_122110104717352134_8799122671438162767_n.jpg
bottom of page